Music has been credited with many things – from calming adults with anxiety and depression to helping hone mathematical genius in young children. There’s even a segment of green thumbs who believe it can help plants grow better! So, if you’re trying to make a smarter baby by playing classical music or having the family sing to the baby through the mom’s belly, you may want to know how much it actually matters. Do sound and music affect a fetus? How does the baby in the womb respond to them? Some studies have claimed that the effect of music on a fetus includes improved cognition, motor skills, and attention span in newborns and that prenatal music can be a tool for auditory learning. How true is this? To get there, first, let’s see when a fetus can actually hear sounds and music.
Most Fetuses Develop Hearing By Week 25
The baby develops the structural forms of the ears fairly early on, specifically during the first 20 weeks in the womb. The neurosensory development of the ears and the auditory system begins after this.
Your fetus can hear your voice by 31 weeks of gestation.
Research even suggests that fetuses can respond to tone frequencies of 500 Hz as early as 23 weeks into gestation. By 27 weeks, the range broadens to frequencies under 500 Hz. By 31 weeks when the baby is just 1.5 months from full term, it begins to respond to frequencies from 1,000 to 3,000 Hz as well.2 Human speech is typically in the 1,000 Hz to 5,000 Hz range, though music could hit higher pitches or go lower.3
Fetal Heart Rate Changes With Music
To test the effect of music on fetuses, one study tested their responses to a piece of classical music – a 5-minute
- Fetuses as young as 28–32 weeks registered a rise in heart rate when music was played at louder decibels, within just 30 seconds of the music beginning to play.
Fetus heart rate drops when music is played at lower decibels. This is a sign that it is paying attention to the music.
- Fetuses over 33 weeks registered a steady gradual rise in their heart rate as the music played out in the 5-minute window, irrespective of the decibel level.
- Fetuses at term were also impacted by the speed of the song, with heart rate rising as tempo increased.
- For all fetuses, the heart rate actually reduced when music played at lower decibels. The researchers saw this as a sign of the fetus paying attention to the audio stimulus.
Going by this, we can conclude that a fetus is able to experience music and sound. But remember,
Fetuses Can Learn Through Music
For your baby to learn while in the womb, certain things have to fall into place. For sound to make a difference, the fetus needs5:
- A developed auditory system: The fetus must have a developed auditory system and should be able to hear. We already know that the baby can hear a wide range of sounds within 31 weeks.
- High quality of sound: The sound you play should also be detectable in the amniotic environment as the amniotic fluid can muffle sounds. Also, to monitor reaction to stimuli in utero (inside the womb), play music in the range of frequency that the fetus can detect at that particular stage of gestation.
- An ability to establish memories: The fetus has to be able to form memories. This is where the challenge lies. It
Newborns Can Identify Music Heard In The Womb
One study involved the playing of a certain soap opera tune to mothers-to-be during their pregnancy. The newborns aged 2 to 4 days, none of whom were exposed to the tune after birth, all became more alert when the tune was played. They were compared against babies whose mothers had not listened to that music while pregnant.
The researchers also found that if not continuously exposed to the music even after birth, the neonates forgot the melody. They also concluded that fetuses start responding to and recognizing familiar sounds between weeks 30 and 37 in utero.6
Fetal Auditory Learning Can Start By Week 27
A 2013 study looked at the effect of “auditory learning” in the fetal stage by playing the tune of “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star” 5 times
Those who had been exposed to the music before they were born were more responsive to the unchanged notes than the control group. Even the amplitude or extent of response increased directly in relation to how much prenatal exposure they had to the music.
The researchers concluded that the babies responded to melodies they had heard while they were in the mother’s uterus and that fetal auditory learning could come into play by the 27th week of gestation.7
Babies Start Learning Language In The Womb
Not just the music but the language in which you sing a song to your fetus can matter too. There are a number of interesting researches that show how language learning begins in the womb.
A 2009 study found that babies pick up language
Newborns remember the vowel sounds and the intonations of the language they heard in the womb. This is an important aspect of language learning.
In another study, Swedish and American newborns (7–75 hours of age) responded differently to a particular vowel sound in their native and non-native languages.9 The researchers surmised that they retained memories of the language they heard in the womb.
A more recent study claims that fetuses as young as 16 weeks opened and closed their mouths and moved their tongues in response to loud music. However, this effect was seen only when the
Learning Via Music Backed By Philosophy Of Garbh Sanskar
Traditional Indian ways have suggested the possibility of prenatal learning for centuries. According to this philosophy, a baby can be taught or exposed to positive values right from when it is in the womb. There are even pre-recorded compilations of affirmations and soothing music that you can play for your baby while it’s still inside the uterus. Called “garbh sanskar,” this approach has even been tested for its effectiveness in helping a woman have a normal healthy pregnancy.
As per the Indian philosophy of garbh sanskar, what the fetus hears can influence its development after birth.
In one study, expectant mothers, even before the 20-week marker of their pregnancy, were asked to listen to a 50-minute long recording of a combination of chants, sounds of nature, and instrumental music just before bedtime. Researchers concluded that garbh sanskar had a beneficial effect on the behavior of the newborn and could potential positively influence brain development.11
Prenatal Music Can Have All-Round Impact On Baby
Several other studies have looked at the long-term impact of prenatal music on babies. Parents-to-be can take heart from the following!
A study from 1985 showed that babies who had been exposed to music before birth had longer attention spans, imitated adult sounds better, and tried to communicate through sound earlier.12
A 1997 study exposed fetuses to about 70 hours of classical music on the violin from the 28th week of pregnancy to the end of pregnancy. These newborns had better gross and fine motor activities, language development, cognitive skills (some), and body coordination than those who had not been exposed to music.13
Babies exposed to music in the womb often show better motor and cognitive skills. They have longer attention spans and higher mental functions. They also cry less, sleep better, and suffer less frequently from colic.
A more recent 2012 study also found that music has a beneficial effect on newborns in terms of their alertness to visual and auditory stimulus and their range of behavior. What these abilities indicate is a higher mental function in the newborns.14
If you sing lullabies to your unborn baby, here’s good news. It can increase your bonding with your baby. A very recent study finds that babies whose moms sang to them when they were in the womb cried less than babies whose moms did not. The babies also had fewer instances of colic in the 2 months after birth. They also woke up fewer times at night, and the moms were less under stress.15
All in all, playing music to your little one in the womb can give them a nudge in the right direction.
Playing Music For A Fetus: Dos And Don’ts
While it may seem like a good idea to give your baby a head start, proceed with caution. This way you avoid unwittingly doing your baby more harm than good.16 Look out for the following to keep your baby (and yourself) safe and happy:
- Enjoy the music: Do enjoy the music for yourself, especially if it helps you de-stress. Just don’t expect it to work miracles for your baby. If it puts you in a happy headspace and calms you, consider the job done. After all, what’s good for you is good for the baby!
- Don’t experiment: Don’t try and force the matter by doing what some researchers call “exaggerated acoustic stimulation.” Experimenting with different intensities of music and sound frequencies out of the ordinary just so your fetus can hear or react is a no-no. It could damage their hearing, impair development, and even impact behavioral state.
- Avoid too much noise: There have been multiple reports of shortened gestation and preterm deliveries as a result of exposure to noise levels of 80 dB and over for an 8-hour shift at work, or from maternal exposure to loud noise due to the home being near an airport and other places with high noise levels.17 Exposure to high levels of noise can cause decreased birth weight of infants.18
- Don’t fall for gimmicks: Don’t splurge on items like special bracelets or bells on chains to wear so your baby can hear you in the uterus. These are unlikely to be able to cross the hearing thresholds inside the uterus!
|↑1||Graven, Stanley N., and Joy V. Browne. “Auditory development in the fetus and infant.” Newborn and infant nursing reviews 8, no. 4 (2008): 187-193.|
|↑2, ↑5, ↑16||Arabin, Benjamin. “Music during pregnancy.” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 20, no. 5 (2002): 425-430.|
|↑3||What sounds can we hear?. University of Rhode Island.|
|↑4||Kisilevsky, B. S., S. M. J. Hains, A‐Y. Jacquet, Carolyn Granier‐Deferre, and Jean-Pierre Lecanuet. “Maturation of fetal responses to music.” Developmental Science 7, no. 5 (2004): 550-559.|
|↑6||Hepper, Peter G. “An examination of fetal learning before and after birth.” The Irish Journal of Psychology 12, no. 2 (1991): 95-107.|
|↑7||Partanen, Eino, Teija Kujala, Mari Tervaniemi, and Minna Huotilainen. “Prenatal music exposure induces long-term neural effects.” PLoS One 8, no. 10 (2013): e78946.|
|↑8||Mampe, Birgit, Angela D. Friederici, Anne Christophe, and Kathleen Wermke. “Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language.” Current biology 19, no. 23 (2009): 1994-1997.|
|↑9||Moon, Christine, Hugo Lagercrantz, and Patricia K. Kuhl. “Language experienced in utero affects vowel perception after birth: A two‐country study.” Acta Paediatrica 102, no. 2 (2013): 156-160.|
|↑10||López-Teijón, Marisa, Álex García-Faura, and Alberto Prats-Galino. “Fetal facial expression in response to intravaginal music emission.” Ultrasound 23, no. 4 (2015): 216-223.|
|↑11||Arya, Ravindra, Maya Chansoria, Ramesh Konanki, and Dileep K. Tiwari. “Maternal music exposure during pregnancy influences neonatal behaviour: an open-label randomized controlled trial.” International journal of pediatrics 2012 (2012)|
|↑12||Shetler, Donald J. “Prenatal music experiences.” Music Educators Journal 71, no. 7 (1985): 26-27.|
|↑13||Lafuente, M. J., R. Grifol, J. Segarra, J. Soriano, M. A. Gorba, and A. Montesinos. “Effects of the Firstart method of prenatal stimulation on psychomotor development: The first six months.” Pre-and Peri-Natal Psychology Journal 11, no. 3 (1997): 151.|
|↑14||Arya, Ravindra, Maya Chansoria, Ramesh Konanki, and Dileep K. Tiwari. “Maternal music exposure during pregnancy influences neonatal behaviour: an open-label randomized controlled trial.” International journal of pediatrics 2012 (2012).|
|↑15||Persico, Giuseppina, Laura Antolini, Patrizia Vergani, Walter Costantini, Maria Teresa Nardi, and Lidia Bellotti. “Maternal singing of lullabies during pregnancy and after birth: Effects on mother–infant bonding and on newborns’ behaviour. Concurrent Cohort Study.” Women and Birth (2017).|
|↑17, ↑18||Etzel, R. A., S. J. Balk, C. F. Bearer, M. D. Miller, K. M. Shea, P. R. Simon, H. FALK et al. “Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn.” Pediatrics 100, no. 4 (1997): 724-727.|